A Major Decision From The FDA Today Could Dramatically Reshape The Vaping Industry
Enlarge this image
E-Cigarette vaporizer components and products are displayed at Smoke and Gift Shop on June 25, 2019 in San Francisco, California.
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Vaping Related Lung Injuries Climb Past 2,500 And 54 Deaths
Additionally, virtually all e-cigarette products contain nicotine, some in very high levels — including Juul’s 5% pods, each of which contains as much nicotine as an entire pack of cigarettes. Nicotine affects prenatal and adolescent brain development, making it dangerous for both teenagers and pregnant people to vape.
«If any e-cigarette could actually help a smoker quit, they would apply to be a drug through other pathways that the FDA [has], and they would demonstrate that they are safe and effective in helping smokers quit,» said Erika Sward of the American Lung Association, which has advocated for the denial of all applications to the FDA for any flavored tobacco product.
«Instead, what we’ve seen is another generation of kids addicted and a whole situation where we have millions of smokers — who might otherwise try to end their addiction — try to use this product,» she said.
The FDA’s decisions are due today, but it’s not clear yet what they’ll decide
In 2019, a federal judge ordered e-cigarette manufacturers to submit applications to the FDA by 2020. Their products would be allowed to remain on the market for one year while the agency reviewed them. That year-long deadline is up Thursday.
How Vaping Snuck Up On Regulators
The agency may not respond to every application by today’s deadline. It has said it will prioritize based on market share, meaning companies like like Juul, along with British American Tobacco and Imperial Brands, which respectively own the brands Vype and blu, may face decisions as soon as today.
Possibilities range from a major crackdown on virtually all vape products to a more targeted approach, perhaps blocking the sale of flavored products or disposable e-cigarettes, or creating marketing rules similar to those that govern traditional cigarettes.
«If they approve any of these, they definitely will have restrictions on both marketing and some of the product design that will be [intended] to reduce youth initiation and use,» said Kathleen Hoke, a professor of public health law at the University of Maryland.
Last month, the agency made its first set of marketing denials for some 55,000 flavored vape products from three companies, ordering them to pull their products from the market. It has also denied applications for companies marketing flavors designed to appeal to kids such as Apple Crumble and Cinnamon Toast Cereal.
Regulators said the applications from its first set of denials «lacked sufficient evidence» that any benefit to adult smokers outweighed «the public health threat posed by the well-documented, alarming levels of youth use of such products.»
Some researchers worry that a major crackdown on Juul and other manufacturers will simply send teenagers reaching for traditional cigarettes instead.
«I think it would be a public health disaster,» said Dr. Michael Siegel, a researcher at Tufts University who studies youth tobacco and alcohol use. «Vaping is not causing a culture of smoking. It’s actually replacing that culture.»
Youth smoking rates have fallen dramatically in recent years as vaping has exploded in popularity. But other researchers are skeptical the trend would reverse.
«Whether those people chose to choose to go back to a cigarette that tastes like a cigarette or a vape product that tastes like a cigarette, I think is anyone’s guess,» said Hoke.
Additional reporting by Allison Aubrey and Bobby Allyn.