Oregon Has A New Plan To Protect Homes From Wildfire. Homebuilders Are Pushing Back

Enlarge this image

Mary Bradshaw’s fire-hardened home in Elkhorn, Oregon, on Feb. 26, 2021. It was one of few that survived the Beachie Creek fire in the area.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB


hide caption

toggle caption

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB


Climate
A Single Fire Killed Thousands Of Sequoias. Scientists Are Racing To Save The Rest

Oregon leaders are hoping some of these measures will help save homes from burning in future wildfires as summers in the West get hotter, drier and more fire-prone. But they have been the most controversial part of a sweeping new wildfire protection plan, facing pushback from property owners, and homebuilding and agricultural industries.

In a compromise of sorts, those groups, along with others, will now spend the next year advising state agencies on how to map out the state’s most fire-prone areas, and determine where the home-hardening rules will be required.

Most states don’t require fire-resistant materials

California has mandated wildfire building codes in high risk areas for more than a decade, but it’s an outlier. An NPR analysis last year found most states don’t require rebuilding with fire-resistant materials, and home builders associations have mounted stiff opposition to proposals to do that.


Environment
Rebuilding After A Wildfire? Most States Don’t Require Fire-Resistant Materials

That happened in Oregon when officials first pushed for wildfire building codes several years ago. The Oregon Home Builders Association testified the measures would add substantial cost to a home’s price, even though other assessments found fire-resistant homes would be minimally higher, or even cheaper. The state did approve fire mitigation codes in 2019, but left them optional.

Then last year, raging wildfires in Oregon destroyed thousands of homes and killed nine people.

Enlarge this image

Remains of the devastation from the 2020 Beachie Creek Fire are evident in the small town of Gates, Feb. 26, 2021.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB


hide caption

toggle caption

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB


Planet Money
How A Blistering Housing Market Could Be Making Wildfires Even More Dangerous

Sen. Jeff Golden, a Democratic state senator who led the effort to pass the bill, said it’s important to know what parts of the state are most at risk from wildfire and prioritize action in those areas.

«Nobody’s even beginning to think we’re going to eliminate wildfire going forward, but just reduce risks and protect communities,» he said. «We’re fighting for our survival in a very real way, and there’s a lot of trends working against us.»

Enlarge this image

Mary Bradshaw’s fire-hardened home in Elkhorn has no gutters that could collect flammable pine needles and leaves. There is also no roof vent that could allow in embers, and roofing and siding materials are composite, metal, clay or tile.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB


hide caption

toggle caption

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB


Consider This from NPR
Why Wildfire Is Not Just A Western Problem


Climate
Sheltering Inside May Not Protect You From The Dangers Of Wildfire Smoke

«We are looking for a balance between letting people do exactly what they want on their private property and responding to this existential threat,» Golden said.

During the legislative session, critics from real estate, construction and agricultural industries again sounded alarms. They worried broad restrictions would increase costs for property owners, home builders and farmers and infringe on private property rights.

«If Senator Golden thinks for a minute I’m going to cut down the 200-year-old, 200-foot-tall, old growth ponderosa pine in my yard he is mistaken,» Oregon Sen. Betsy Johnson said on a radio show. «I’m just not sure I want unseen, unaccountable, unelected bureaucrats dictating the future of the state of Oregon and how we all are going to live on our own property.»

Opponents of the new rules are on the advisory committees that will help figure out where to require them. They include Mark Long, CEO of the Oregon Homebuilders Association, and Dave Hunnicutt, president of the Oregon Property Owners Association. Hunnicutt worries the rules will not be applied narrowly enough.

«We have a proposed definition of wildland urban interface that will essentially include the entire state of Oregon,» he said.

Enlarge this image

Aaron Blacklock, left, and Joel Conaway of Oregon’s Wildfire Workforce Corps clear undergrowth in a Eugene community to help reduce the risk of wildfire in the neighborhood, March 30, 2021.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB


hide caption

toggle caption

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB

Aaron Blacklock, left, and Joel Conaway of Oregon’s Wildfire Workforce Corps clear undergrowth in a Eugene community to help reduce the risk of wildfire in the neighborhood, March 30, 2021.

Kristyna Wentz-Graff/OPB

Meanwhile, a new program has already launched — with $11 million in funding from the new lawto clear flammable brush from the «home ignition zone» in wildland urban interface areas.

Jeff Parker, Executive Director of Northwest Youth Corps, said many communities have natural areas loaded with excess fuel that could send a fire burning faster and hotter toward nearby homes.

His workforce training group usually pays young people to clear weeds or build trails in wilderness areas, but now they’ll be spending more time in neighborhoods, basically doing extreme yard work.

«Our objective here is to… make sure our community has resiliency,» Parker said. «So if a fire does roll through it doesn’t have the catastrophic impact, the mass displacement of people and the impact on the community.»

Комментарии 0