The Federal Election Commission Can Finally Meet Again. And It Has A Big Backlog

Enlarge this image

The Federal Election Commission, which regulates campaign finance law, has not been able to meet since July and is now facing a backlog of work.

Caroline Amenabar/NPR; 401(K) 2012/Flickr

hide caption

toggle caption

Caroline Amenabar/NPR; 401(K) 2012/Flickr

What’s At Stake With Trump’s Threat: COVID Relief And A Government Shutdown

Noti, now senior director for trial litigation and chief of staff at the Campaign Legal Center, says the commission is divided not so much by party, but ideology.

«The usual situation has been that the Democratic FEC commissioners have tried to enforce campaign finance law against both Democrats and Republicans, have tried to enforce it somewhat stringently,» he says. «And the Republican commissioners have generally opposed enforcement of the law, regardless of whether the law-breaker was a Republican group or a Democratic group.»

One of the highest-profile cases before the FEC was brought by the Campaign Legal Center against the Trump campaign and a related political action committee. It charges the campaign «disguised nearly $170 million of campaign spending by laundering the funds through firms headed by Trump’s recent campaign manager, Brad Parscale, and/or created by Trump 2 campaign lawyers.» The campaign has denied the charge.

Morale Down, Federal Workforce Gets Ready For A New Boss

Former FEC chairman Bradley Smith, a Republican, says the differences on the commission are usually over how campaign law should be interpreted.

«I think this idea that the commission frequently deadlocks is probably vastly overstated,» he says. «Most of the cases are pretty routine. It does come up on questions of how aggressively I think at times to interpret the law and whether one one views it as something that should be interpreted narrowly or broadly in scope.»

While the FEC was idled by lack of a quorum, it amassed a backlog of some 446 cases.

Smith says one issue he’d like the commission to address is political contributions by nonprofits, like the Sierra Club or National Right to Life. He says it’s unclear whether the names of donors to those groups — who may not have given for political reasons, but to support the cause — should be disclosed.

«It’s not quite clear how much [the groups] need to disclose in terms of donors who may have given for totally different reasons. And it’s not like a donor who gives to a campaign or donor gives to a political party or a PAC and expects it to be used on politics. So this is a tough issue out there,» he says.

Another big case pertains to Mike Bloomberg, according to Michael Beckel with the political reform group Issue One. Beckel says the former New York City mayor transferred $18 million from his failed presidential bid this year to the Democratic Party.

«Michael Bloomberg’s self-funded his presidential campaign, which made this $18 million transfer essentially an $18 million donation from him to the DNC, which far exceeded our campaign contribution limits. So that’s a big high-profile case,» he says.

Комментарии 0

Оставить комментарий