The Push For Internet Voting Continues, Mostly Thanks To One Guy

Enlarge this image

The founder and CEO of Tusk Holdings, Bradley Tusk, speaks onstage during TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2016 in San Francisco. On Thursday, he announced a $10 million grant for internet voting development.

Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch

hide caption

toggle caption

Steve Jennings/Getty Images for TechCrunch

In 2020, Some Americans Will Vote On Their Phones. Is That The Future?

That transmission process will be end-to-end verifiable, says Jacob Gyldenkærne, CEO of Assembly Voting, meaning a voter will have a way to make sure their vote was recorded and counted correctly and was not tampered with in transit.

End-to-end verifiability is considered a prerequisite by some cybersecurity experts for any internet voting system, though Gyldenkærne says even with such verifiability, he expects a flood of questions about the security of whatever system Assembly Voting comes up with.

«We are very open to academic researchers, ethical hackers and the security community,» says Gyldenkærne. «It’s a massive project, and it’s important to say it’s a development project. … We do not have the holy grail.»

Election technology provided by Assembly has never been used by a state or local government in the United States.

Tusk is optimistic skeptics can be won over

Assembly will face an uphill battle to win over a cybersecurity community that has been dubious, if not appalled, by the idea of such a mobile voting system.

The Coronavirus Crisis
States Expand Internet Voting Experiments Amid Pandemic, Raising Security Fears

«There is a firm consensus in the cybersecurity community that mobile voting on a smartphone is a really stupid idea,» Duncan Buell, a computer science professor at the University of South Carolina who specializes in election technology, said in an interview with NPR last year.

Greg Miller, of the OSET Institute, says he has traditionally agreed with that line of thinking. But he has been heartened by what he sees as a seriousness from Tusk to engage with the security community, including by adhering to upcoming recommendations from a working group focused on digital voting at the University of California, Berkeley and by working with the cybersecurity company Synack to vet grant applications.

Untangling Disinformation
Voting Data From A Colorado County Was Leaked Online. Now The Clerk Is In Hiding

«This sounds like the right approach,» says Miller. «It’s not a race to commercialization. It’s a paced progress towards a system that everyone can take a good clear look at.»

Tusk says he knows security-minded experts may not give their blessing at first, but he’s optimistic that once the open-source system is ready for piloting and examination, currently scheduled for mid-2022, at least some skeptics can be won over.

He also acknowledges that the conspiracy theories around election technology in the 2020 election may present an obstacle. Many election administrators may hesitate to experiment with new technology that could bring on even more claims of fraud and hacking.

But he says that such claims stem from how polarized politics are in the U.S. currently and that higher-turnout elections and especially primaries could offer a solution.

«The last few years in some ways have made [this effort] harder,» Tusk says. «They’ve also made it more necessary.»

  • tusk
  • election security
  • voting

Комментарии 0

Оставить комментарий